PsiPog.net Forum Index » Constructs » Something i thought of
| Something i thought of | |||
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Posted on Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:52 am | |||
genjo
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 |
yeah i second that. besides, if we dont have answers, then why are we going on and on. this is all subjective at the mo' |
||
| Back to top | |||
| Posted on Tue Jun 27, 2006 8:59 pm | |||
freakinrican626
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 |
it was not what you were proving that bothered me. it was how you were proving it. if you read in other posts, i plainly said that i believed that psiballs obeyed the laws of physics.
categorical syllogism may be something scientists use to solve theorems and what not, but since we know hardly anything about psiballs i do not feel using categorical syllogism an appropriate thing to use to prove the theory. no i do not mind language at all. it is a necessary tool of communication. language just has some limitations that can be seen most clearly through categorical syllogism. i wrote a paper on language and zen and i talked about language's limitations. since that was a while back i cannot recall the exact terms for the limitations presented in categorical syllogism, but i dont think it would be that hard to research on your own either. if i happen to find my paper ill tell you what those limitations are. you misread my post, particially because i was kind of heated and could not articulate myself as best as i wanted to. |
||
| Back to top | |||
PsiPog.net Forum Index » Constructs » Something i thought of
All Content, Images, Video, Text, and Software is © Copyright 2000-2006 PsiPog.net and their respective authors. All Rights Reserved.
You must agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy to view this website. Click here to contact the webmaster. XHTML?